How does this align with my curriculum?
Learn about two taxonomy systems that scientists use to classify the life around us.
People have always tried to classify living things. But Earth is home to between 10 million and one trillion different species. That’s a lot of things to identify and name!
Biologists who classify organisms are called taxonomists. Taxonomy involves three steps. First, you identify a living thing. Then, you name it. Finally, you classify it in relation to other living things.
For a long time, taxonomy was based on morphology. That means it was all about physical attributes like size, shape, colour and body structure. People have managed to describe about two million species this way. But that means most of the planet’s species still need to be named and classified.
New technologies like DNA barcoding are helping scientists catch up. This is the second big change in taxonomy. The first one happened about 250 years ago. Together, they provide the keys to understanding Earth’s biodiversity.
The Birth of Modern Taxonomy
Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778) was a famous Swedish scientist. His work totally changed taxonomy. Scientists still use the Linnaean taxonomic system today.
Biological nomenclature is a fancy way of saying “how you name living things.” Before Linnaeus, people classified organisms using long strings of Latin words. Consider the European honeybee’s full scientific name. It was Apis pubescens, thorace subgriseo, abdomine fusco, pedibus posticus glabis, untrinque margine ciliatus. That doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue!
Linnaeus simplified things by using just two names for each species. One name refers to the genus. The other one refers to the species. This is called the binomial naming system.
For example, humans are called Homo sapiens. Homo is our genus. Sapiens is our species. This system gave the European honeybee a much simpler scientific name: Apis mellifera.
Did you know?
The oldest standard scientific names for plants and animals come from two books by Linnaeus. He published Systema Naturae in 1735 and Species Plantarum in 1753.
Linnaeus borrowed the terms “genus” and “species” from Aristotle. Have you heard of him? He was a Greek philosopher and zoologist who lived about 2 400 years ago. Aristotle put animals with similar attributes into broad groups. He called these groups genera (the plural form of genus). Then, he defined species within each genus.
Did you know?
Aristotle classified animals based on whether they or not had red blood. This broadly matches the modern categories of vertebrates and invertebrates.
Linnaeus also changed how scientists classify organisms. These changes were especially important for plants. Linnaeus continued to group plants based on shared physical attributes. But he stopped looking at the entire plant. Instead, he focused on the anatomy of the reproductive system. This made plant taxonomy much simpler.
Linnaeus divided plants and animals into broad kingdoms. He then subdivided them into phyla, classes, orders, families, genera and species. Sound familiar? Generations of biologists have followed this system. Scientists still use it today.
What are the limitations of the Linnaean taxonomic system?
The Linnaean system isn’t perfect.
To begin with, there’s the problem of damaged or incomplete specimens. Sometimes scientist only have a tiny bit of a plant or animal. That means they can’t identify it based on morphology.
Some species go through different stages of development. They can look very different at each stage. Think of a caterpillar that goes through metamorphosis. The adult butterfly belongs to the same species (Danaus plexippus). But its morphology is completely different.
Finally, there’s the problem of cryptic species. These are organisms that look very similar but are actually different species. Northern and Southern Leopard frogs are good examples of cryptic species.
These problems make it harder to identify species using Linnaean taxonomy. Even expert taxonomists have their limits. There are only so many species one person can identify!
DNA Barcoding Shakes Things Up
Paul Hebert is a professor at the University of Guelph. In 2003, he introduced DNA barcoding. This technique is based on DNA sequencing.
DNA barcodes are like Universal Product Codes (UPCs). UPCs use a series of black bars to create unique tags for consumer products. Professor Hebert found a way to create tags based on an organism’s DNA. Each species has a different barcode. These barcodes reflect genetic differences at the molecular level.
DNA is like a recipe book for living things. The recipes are written with molecules of Adenine (A), Cytosine (C), Thymine (T) and Guanine (G). These bases bond with each other to create base pairs. Base pairs form strands of DNA. And these strands create the famous double helix structure of DNA.
In some genes, the DNA sequence is the same for all members of the same species. But it’s different for members of different species. So a DNA barcode is simply the sequence of molecules in a specific stretch of DNA. It identifies a species at the molecular level.
DNA barcoding improves on Linnaean taxonomy. It overcomes some pitfalls you face when trying to identify a species based on morphology. DNA is a very tough molecule. You can recover it from damaged, degraded or even incomplete specimens. A species might go through different stages of development. But its genetic code never changes. And cryptic species will always have differences in their DNA. Their barcodes will be different no matter how much they look alike!
How is DNA Barcoding used?
In 2008, scientists established the International Barcode of Life (iBOL) consortium. It is a research alliance between groups in 25 different countries.
The University of Guelph isn’t just the birthplace of DNA barcoding. It’s also home to the Biodiversity Research Institute of Ontario. This group develops barcoding tools and analyzes specimens. It also manages a public collection of barcodes called the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD). So far, BOLD has collected DNA barcodes for more than 600 000 named species.
DNA barcoding has widespread applications.
Since 2016, students across Canada have collected fish samples at grocery stores to help identify food fraud.
DNA barcoding also supports conservation efforts. For example, it’s being used to find predators of the Colorado potato beetle. This beetle destroys potato, tomato and pepper crops. Scientists are barcoding the stomach contents of different insects. They want to see which ones eat the most potato beetles. The insects can then be used to control the beetle population.
DNA barcoding can even help catch poachers. It can be used to analyze the remains of an animal. Even a little piece of meat will do. Authorities look to see if the DNA barcode matches a protected animal. If it does, they’ll know that the remains came from a poached animal.
Linnaean taxonomy and DNA barcoding are both important. They’re more than just stamp collecting for scientists. They give us a better understanding of the diversity of life on Earth.
Many of Earth’s ecosystems are threatened by climate change, pollution and development. So it is extremely important to know what creatures share the planet with us. We also need to understand how these species are distributed and how they interact. Protecting biodiversity would be a huge victory for science. It would certainly make Linnaeus proud!